EmLogic AS vs EES: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EmLogic AS (3.8/5) edges ahead of EES (3.8/5) overall. EmLogic AS is the better choice for teams wanting Zephyr RTOS specialists led by repeat embedded-company founders. EES is the stronger option for teams deliberately avoiding a large delivery organization in favor of senior-led staff. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EmLogic AS vs EES: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EmLogic AS | EES |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 2012 |
| HQ | Norway | Tempe / Chandler, AZ, USA |
| Team size | Not published | 3–50 |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS | Explicitly positions itself as senior-led, keeping the team small by design rather than as a growth-stage limitation |
| Pricing model | Project-based embedded design engagements | Contract engineering engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C | C, C++, Industrial Embedded Systems |
| Industries served | Industrial, IoT hardware | Industrial |
EmLogic AS vs EES: overview
EmLogic AS
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. For a hiring buyer, that founder background matters: this is a team led by people who've already built and run comparable firms before, not first-time founders learning the business alongside the client. The firm's stated depth in Zephyr RTOS is a specific, current specialty in the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as a de facto standard.
EES
Embedded Engineering Solutions (EES) was launched in 2012 and is based in Tempe, Arizona, with reported headcount varying across sources from roughly 3 to 50 employees, most consistently described as a small, senior-led firm. The company specializes in contract firmware, embedded systems, and hardware design engineering for the industrial sector, and its own positioning leans on being senior-led rather than layered with junior staff. For a hiring buyer specifically avoiding a large delivery organization, that's the stated value proposition, not an incidental trait.
Services and capabilities: EmLogic AS vs EES
| Capability | EmLogic AS | EES |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety | ✗ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: EmLogic AS vs EES
| Framework / platform | EmLogic AS | EES |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| LVGL | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EmLogic AS vs EES
| Criterion | EmLogic AS | EES |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based embedded design | Contract firmware and hardware engineering |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EmLogic AS vs EES
| Dimension | EmLogic AS | EES |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial, IoT hardware | Industrial |
| Best use cases | Hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders, Migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Hiring a deliberately small, senior-led team for an industrial firmware program, Combined hardware and firmware engineering without separate specialist vendors |
| Typical project type | Project-based embedded design | Contract firmware and hardware engineering |
EmLogic AS vs EES: pros and cons
| EmLogic AS | |
|---|---|
| + | All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship |
| + | Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system much of the industry now treats as a de facto standard |
| + | FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects needing custom logic as well as MCU code |
| + | Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving access to a broader company-building network |
| - | Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any team on this list |
| - | Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| EES | |
|---|---|
| + | Explicit senior-led positioning means the small team size is a deliberate choice, not just a growth-stage limitation |
| + | 13 years of operating history as a contract engineering firm for the industrial sector |
| + | Combines firmware, embedded systems, and hardware design in one team, covering multiple disciplines without separate specialist hires |
| + | Small size means a client's engagement represents a meaningful share of the firm's total capacity |
| - | Reported employee counts vary widely across sources, from roughly 3 to 50, worth confirming current headcount directly |
| - | Small team size caps capacity for a large or multi-workstream program |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose EmLogic AS?
A typical fit: hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders.
Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware.
Who should choose EES?
A typical fit: hiring a deliberately small, senior-led team for an industrial firmware program.
Explicitly positions itself as senior-led, keeping the team small by design rather than as a growth-stage limitation. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial.
Decision matrix: EmLogic AS vs EES
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EmLogic AS (Not published) vs EES (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EmLogic AS |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EmLogic AS vs EES
| Use case | EmLogic AS fit | EES fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Strong | Limited | EmLogic AS |
| Hiring a deliberately small, senior-led team for an industrial firmware program | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Combined hardware and firmware engineering without separate specialist vendors | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EmLogic AS vs EES
EmLogic AS (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS.
EES (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need combined hardware and firmware engineering without separate specialist vendors. If your situation matches that, EES is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EmLogic AS vs EES FAQ
Is EmLogic AS better than EES?
EmLogic AS (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EmLogic AS's strongest advantage: all four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship. EES's strongest advantage: explicit senior-led positioning means the small team size is a deliberate choice, not just a growth-stage limitation.
How do EmLogic AS and EES differ in pricing?
EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. EES uses contract engineering engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EmLogic AS or EES?
EES is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EmLogic AS and EES?
EmLogic AS's primary differentiator is: founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. EES's primary differentiator is: explicitly positions itself as senior-led, keeping the team small by design rather than as a growth-stage limitation. They also differ in team size (Not published vs 3–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial, IoT hardware vs Industrial).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.