Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of ARCH-Embedded (3.8/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams needing dedicated engineers with direct chip-vendor backing. ARCH-Embedded is the stronger option for teams needing engineers with direct prior positioning-technology experience. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ARCH-Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2022 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Team size | 200+ | 2–10 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab | Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based embedded consultancy engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | Nordic nRF, Cellular Connectivity, RTOS |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology, Industrial IoT |
Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. For a buyer evaluating who they'd actually work with, the firm's scale means dedicated engineers rather than shared generalist staff, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip and an in-house hardware lab the team uses daily for board bring-up. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline a hiring manager can expect from the assigned team, not just a company-wide policy on paper.
ARCH-Embedded
ARCH-Embedded was founded in Amsterdam in 2022 by CEO and co-founder Mark Riemersma and operates with a team of 2 to 10 people, several with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products. As a Nordic Semiconductor partner, the team covers hardware through embedded software, RTOS, Linux, security, and connected-device architecture. For a hiring buyer building a location-aware or cellular-connected product, a team whose specific prior employer built commercial positioning technology at scale is a differentiated, checkable credential rather than a general claim of IoT experience.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | ARCH-Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety | ✓ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | ARCH-Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | N/A |
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| LVGL | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ARCH-Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based consultancy, Architecture and project management |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | ARCH-Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics | Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology, Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers, Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Hiring engineers with direct positioning-technology experience for a location-aware device, Nordic Semiconductor-based connected product architecture and firmware development |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based consultancy |
Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients |
| + | In-house hardware lab means the assigned team validates board bring-up itself rather than waiting on a separate department |
| + | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status is a credential the actual engineers on a project can draw on directly |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline built into daily team workflow, not just policy documents |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so a manufacturing handoff still needs a separate team |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so team-size and cost fit needs a direct scoping conversation |
| ARCH-Embedded | |
|---|---|
| + | Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background |
| + | Nordic Semiconductor partner status backs its cellular and positioning-technology hardware claims |
| + | Full-stack scope from hardware through RTOS, Linux, and security architecture covers more than firmware coding alone |
| + | Small team size means direct senior engineering involvement on every engagement |
| - | Founded in 2022 with 2 to 10 employees, giving it one of the shortest track records and smallest teams on this list |
| - | Capacity for large or multiple concurrent programs is limited by team size |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers.
200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose ARCH-Embedded?
A typical fit: hiring engineers with direct positioning-technology experience for a location-aware device.
Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology, Industrial IoT.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs ARCH-Embedded (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | ARCH-Embedded fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hiring engineers with direct positioning-technology experience for a location-aware device | Limited | Strong | ARCH-Embedded |
| Nordic Semiconductor-based connected product architecture and firmware development | Limited | Strong | ARCH-Embedded |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab.
ARCH-Embedded (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need nordic Semiconductor-based connected product architecture and firmware development. If your situation matches that, ARCH-Embedded is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs ARCH-Embedded FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than ARCH-Embedded?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients. ARCH-Embedded's strongest advantage: team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background.
How do Lemberg Solutions and ARCH-Embedded differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. ARCH-Embedded uses project-based embedded consultancy engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or ARCH-Embedded?
ARCH-Embedded is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and ARCH-Embedded?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. ARCH-Embedded's primary differentiator is: team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 2–10), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy vs Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.