Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of NOVO Engineering (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams needing dedicated engineers with direct chip-vendor backing. NOVO Engineering is the stronger option for teams wanting engineers with an unusually high average tenure across disciplines. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | NOVO Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2004 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Vista, CA, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 48–60 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab | Engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Fixed-scope product engineering engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | C, C++, Embedded Systems Programming |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology, Commercial products |
Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. For a buyer evaluating who they'd actually work with, the firm's scale means dedicated engineers rather than shared generalist staff, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip and an in-house hardware lab the team uses daily for board bring-up. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline a hiring manager can expect from the assigned team, not just a company-wide policy on paper.
NOVO Engineering
NOVO Engineering was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Vista, California near San Diego, with a second location near Minneapolis and a team reported between 48 and 60 engineers averaging 16 years of experience each. That average-tenure figure is a specific, checkable claim a hiring buyer can weigh directly: it means the typical engineer assigned to a project has already spent over a decade and a half solving comparable problems. Systems engineering scope means firmware roles work alongside mechanical and electrical engineers on the same team, not in a separate silo.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | NOVO Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✓ |
| Functional safety | ✓ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | NOVO Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| LVGL | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | NOVO Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Fixed-scope product engineering, Pre-production manufacturing support |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | NOVO Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics | Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology |
| Best use cases | Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers, Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Hiring a multi-discipline team spanning mechanical, electrical, and firmware, Biotech instrumentation development needing senior, cross-discipline engineers |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Fixed-scope product engineering |
Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients |
| + | In-house hardware lab means the assigned team validates board bring-up itself rather than waiting on a separate department |
| + | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status is a credential the actual engineers on a project can draw on directly |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline built into daily team workflow, not just policy documents |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so a manufacturing handoff still needs a separate team |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so team-size and cost fit needs a direct scoping conversation |
| NOVO Engineering | |
|---|---|
| + | Engineering team averages 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific, checkable seniority claim |
| + | Systems engineering scope puts firmware engineers on the same team as mechanical and electrical staff, not a separate silo |
| + | Two US locations near San Diego and Minneapolis give onsite coverage options |
| + | 21 years of operating history in medical device and biotech instrumentation work |
| - | 48 to 60 engineers caps how many large concurrent programs the team can staff at once |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| - | Firmware is one discipline inside a broader systems-engineering team, not a standalone firmware-only group |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers.
200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose NOVO Engineering?
A typical fit: hiring a multi-discipline team spanning mechanical, electrical, and firmware.
Engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology, Commercial products.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | NOVO Engineering |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs NOVO Engineering (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | NOVO Engineering fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Hiring a multi-discipline team spanning mechanical, electrical, and firmware | Limited | Strong | NOVO Engineering |
| Biotech instrumentation development needing senior, cross-discipline engineers | Limited | Strong | NOVO Engineering |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab.
NOVO Engineering (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need biotech instrumentation development needing senior, cross-discipline engineers. If your situation matches that, NOVO Engineering is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs NOVO Engineering FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than NOVO Engineering?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients. NOVO Engineering's strongest advantage: engineering team averages 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific, checkable seniority claim.
How do Lemberg Solutions and NOVO Engineering differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. NOVO Engineering uses fixed-scope product engineering engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or NOVO Engineering?
NOVO Engineering is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and NOVO Engineering?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. NOVO Engineering's primary differentiator is: engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 48–60), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy vs Medical devices, Biotech).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.