Best Embedded Firmware Developers

Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of USA Firmware (4.0/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams needing dedicated engineers with direct chip-vendor backing. USA Firmware is the stronger option for small teams wanting senior, multi-discipline engineers without separate specialist hires. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: head-to-head summary

Criterion Lemberg Solutions USA Firmware
Founded 2007 2011
HQ Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) Brecksville, OH, USA
Team size 200+ 17
Rating 4.8 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab 150-plus combined years of leadership experience concentrated in a 17-person team, an unusually high seniority ratio
Pricing model Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation Managed design service engagements
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS C, C++, FPGA Design
Industries served Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive Industrial products, Commercial electronics

Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: overview

Lemberg Solutions

Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. For a buyer evaluating who they'd actually work with, the firm's scale means dedicated engineers rather than shared generalist staff, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip and an in-house hardware lab the team uses daily for board bring-up. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline a hiring manager can expect from the assigned team, not just a company-wide policy on paper.

USA Firmware

USA Firmware was founded in 2011 by Bob Scaccia and operates from Brecksville, Ohio with a team of around 17 people. Leadership brings a stated 150-plus combined years of experience concentrated in a small team, which for a hiring buyer means the average tenure and seniority per engineer is unusually high for a firm this size. The managed design process bundles electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA design, and Linux work, so a client hiring this team gets multi-discipline coverage without assembling separate specialists.

Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware

Capability Lemberg Solutions USA Firmware
Firmware development
RTOS development
Hardware co-design
Embedded GUI development
Medical device firmware
Functional safety
Technical training
Expert-witness services
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware

Framework / platform Lemberg Solutions USA Firmware
C
C++
FreeRTOS N/A
Zephyr N/A
FPGA N/A
Embedded Linux
LVGL N/A
AWS IoT N/A N/A
ARM Cortex-M N/A

Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware

Criterion Lemberg Solutions USA Firmware
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation Managed design services
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware

Dimension Lemberg Solutions USA Firmware
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics Industrial products, Commercial electronics
Best use cases Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers, Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment Hiring a small, senior multi-discipline team spanning electrical, firmware, and FPGA, Production-enablement support following an in-house design phase
Typical project type Firmware consulting Managed design services

Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: pros and cons

Lemberg Solutions
+ 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients
+ In-house hardware lab means the assigned team validates board bring-up itself rather than waiting on a separate department
+ Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status is a credential the actual engineers on a project can draw on directly
+ ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline built into daily team workflow, not just policy documents
+ Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery
- Does not run mass production in-house, so a manufacturing handoff still needs a separate team
- Does not handle regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf
- No published minimum engagement figure, so team-size and cost fit needs a direct scoping conversation
USA Firmware
+ 150-plus combined years of leadership experience in a 17-person team is an unusually high seniority ratio
+ Bundles electrical engineering, firmware, and FPGA capability, so a client doesn't need to hire separate specialists
+ Discovery-through-production-enablement scope covers the full program, not just firmware coding
+ 14 years of operating history under its founder
- 17 employees is among the smallest teams on this list, limiting capacity for large parallel workstreams
- Public case study detail is limited, so verifying past engagements requires direct outreach
- No published pricing or minimum engagement figure

Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?

A typical fit: extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers.

200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.

Who should choose USA Firmware?

A typical fit: hiring a small, senior multi-discipline team spanning electrical, firmware, and FPGA.

150-plus combined years of leadership experience concentrated in a 17-person team, an unusually high seniority ratio. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial products, Commercial electronics.

Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Both offer fixed-price models
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs USA Firmware (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Lemberg Solutions
You need staff augmentation or team extension Lemberg Solutions
You need consulting before committing to a build USA Firmware

Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware

Use case Lemberg Solutions fit USA Firmware fit Winner
Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers Strong Limited Lemberg Solutions
Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment Strong Limited Lemberg Solutions
Hiring a small, senior multi-discipline team spanning electrical, firmware, and FPGA Limited Strong USA Firmware
Production-enablement support following an in-house design phase Limited Strong USA Firmware
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware

Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab.

USA Firmware (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need production-enablement support following an in-house design phase. If your situation matches that, USA Firmware is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware FAQ

Is Lemberg Solutions better than USA Firmware?

Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients. USA Firmware's strongest advantage: 150-plus combined years of leadership experience in a 17-person team is an unusually high seniority ratio.

How do Lemberg Solutions and USA Firmware differ in pricing?

Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. USA Firmware uses managed design service engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or USA Firmware?

Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and USA Firmware?

Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. USA Firmware's primary differentiator is: 150-plus combined years of leadership experience concentrated in a 17-person team, an unusually high seniority ratio. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 17), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy vs Industrial products, Commercial electronics).

Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.