Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lobaro GmbH (3.8/5) edges ahead of EmLogic AS (3.8/5) overall. Lobaro GmbH is the better choice for teams needing deep LoRaWAN and low-power wide-area network specialists. EmLogic AS is the stronger option for teams wanting Zephyr RTOS specialists led by repeat embedded-company founders. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lobaro GmbH | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
| HQ | Hamburg, Germany | Norway |
| Team size | 15 | Not published |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth | Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS |
| Pricing model | Project-based IoT firmware and platform engagements | Project-based embedded design engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | LoRa, LoRaWAN, Sigfox | Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Utility metering, Environmental monitoring | Industrial, IoT hardware |
Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS: overview
Lobaro GmbH
Lobaro GmbH was founded in Hamburg in 2012 by Tobias Rohde and has grown to around 15 people, a design partner of Nordic Semiconductor and a member of the LoRa Alliance. That small, focused size means a hiring buyer working with Lobaro is working with a meaningful fraction of the entire firm's engineering capacity on any given engagement, not a rotating slice of a much larger organization. The team's protocol depth spans LoRa, LoRaWAN, Sigfox, LTE, and wireless M-Bus, a specific low-power wide-area networking specialty built over 13 years.
EmLogic AS
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. For a hiring buyer, that founder background matters: this is a team led by people who've already built and run comparable firms before, not first-time founders learning the business alongside the client. The firm's stated depth in Zephyr RTOS is a specific, current specialty in the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as a de facto standard.
Services and capabilities: Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS
| Capability | Lobaro GmbH | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety | ✗ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS
| Framework / platform | Lobaro GmbH | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| LVGL | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS
| Criterion | Lobaro GmbH | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based IoT firmware and platform development | Project-based embedded design |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS
| Dimension | Lobaro GmbH | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Utility metering, Environmental monitoring | Industrial, IoT hardware |
| Best use cases | Hiring a specialized LoRaWAN team for an industrial monitoring deployment, Wireless M-Bus firmware development for a utility metering product | Hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders, Migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr |
| Typical project type | Project-based IoT firmware and platform development | Project-based embedded design |
Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS: pros and cons
| Lobaro GmbH | |
|---|---|
| + | LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status verify its low-power wide-area networking credentials |
| + | A team of around 15 means a client's engagement represents a substantial share of the firm's total capacity, not a thin slice |
| + | 13 years of operating history with a consistent focus on industrial IoT sensor and gateway firmware |
| + | Received public innovation funding through IFB Hamburg's InnoRampUp programme, an independently verifiable signal of institutional confidence |
| - | A team of around 15 people is small relative to industrial IoT programs requiring firmware across many product lines at once |
| - | LPWAN protocol focus is a narrower fit for firmware projects centered on Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or cellular broadband instead |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| EmLogic AS | |
|---|---|
| + | All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship |
| + | Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system much of the industry now treats as a de facto standard |
| + | FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects needing custom logic as well as MCU code |
| + | Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving access to a broader company-building network |
| - | Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any team on this list |
| - | Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lobaro GmbH?
A typical fit: hiring a specialized LoRaWAN team for an industrial monitoring deployment.
LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Utility metering, Environmental monitoring.
Who should choose EmLogic AS?
A typical fit: hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders.
Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware.
Decision matrix: Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lobaro GmbH (Not published) vs EmLogic AS (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lobaro GmbH |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS
| Use case | Lobaro GmbH fit | EmLogic AS fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiring a specialized LoRaWAN team for an industrial monitoring deployment | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Wireless M-Bus firmware development for a utility metering product | Strong | Limited | Lobaro GmbH |
| Hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Limited | Strong | EmLogic AS |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS
Lobaro GmbH (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth.
EmLogic AS (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr. If your situation matches that, EmLogic AS is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lobaro GmbH vs EmLogic AS FAQ
Is Lobaro GmbH better than EmLogic AS?
Lobaro GmbH (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lobaro GmbH's strongest advantage: LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status verify its low-power wide-area networking credentials. EmLogic AS's strongest advantage: all four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship.
How do Lobaro GmbH and EmLogic AS differ in pricing?
Lobaro GmbH uses project-based iot firmware and platform engagements pricing. EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lobaro GmbH or EmLogic AS?
Lobaro GmbH is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lobaro GmbH and EmLogic AS?
Lobaro GmbH's primary differentiator is: LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth. EmLogic AS's primary differentiator is: founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. They also differ in team size (15 vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Utility metering vs Industrial, IoT hardware).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.