Best Embedded Firmware Developers

ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Ripcord Designs (3.8/5) edges ahead of ARCH-Embedded (3.8/5) overall. Ripcord Designs is the better choice for teams wanting senior technical judgment applied directly rather than delegated through management. ARCH-Embedded is the stronger option for teams needing engineers with direct prior positioning-technology experience. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs: head-to-head summary

Criterion ARCH-Embedded Ripcord Designs
Founded 2022 2015
HQ Amsterdam, Netherlands London / Cambridge, UK
Team size 2–10 Not published
Rating 3.8 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background Founded by a former Engineering Director who moved from managing engineering to doing it directly, spanning MedTech, IVD, and industrial products
Pricing model Project-based embedded consultancy engagements Project-based electronics and firmware consulting engagements
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Nordic nRF, Cellular Connectivity, RTOS C, C++, Embedded Linux
Industries served Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology, Industrial IoT MedTech, IVD & lab devices, Robotics & industrial, Consumer electronics

ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs: overview

ARCH-Embedded

ARCH-Embedded was founded in Amsterdam in 2022 by CEO and co-founder Mark Riemersma and operates with a team of 2 to 10 people, several with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products. As a Nordic Semiconductor partner, the team covers hardware through embedded software, RTOS, Linux, security, and connected-device architecture. For a hiring buyer building a location-aware or cellular-connected product, a team whose specific prior employer built commercial positioning technology at scale is a differentiated, checkable credential rather than a general claim of IoT experience.

Ripcord Designs

Ripcord Designs is a UK-based electronic and embedded software design consultancy operating from the London and Cambridge area, founded around 2015 by Adam, previously Engineering Director at Broadcast Sports. That career move, from managing engineering at a larger company to building a smaller hands-on practice, is a specific signal about the kind of team a hiring buyer would be working with: senior technical judgment applied directly, not delegated down through management layers. The firm spans MedTech, IVD and lab devices, robotics and industrial, and consumer electronics work.

Services and capabilities: ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs

Capability ARCH-Embedded Ripcord Designs
Firmware development
RTOS development
Hardware co-design
Embedded GUI development
Medical device firmware
Functional safety
Technical training
Expert-witness services
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs

Framework / platform ARCH-Embedded Ripcord Designs
C
C++ N/A
FreeRTOS N/A N/A
Zephyr N/A N/A
FPGA N/A N/A
Embedded Linux
LVGL N/A N/A
AWS IoT N/A N/A
ARM Cortex-M N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs

Criterion ARCH-Embedded Ripcord Designs
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Project-based consultancy, Architecture and project management Project-based consulting and development
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs

Dimension ARCH-Embedded Ripcord Designs
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology, Industrial IoT MedTech, IVD & lab devices, Robotics & industrial
Best use cases Hiring engineers with direct positioning-technology experience for a location-aware device, Nordic Semiconductor-based connected product architecture and firmware development Hiring senior technical judgment directly, without management layers, for a MedTech or IVD device, Compliance-aware design consulting for a robotics or industrial product
Typical project type Project-based consultancy Project-based consulting and development

ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs: pros and cons

ARCH-Embedded
+ Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background
+ Nordic Semiconductor partner status backs its cellular and positioning-technology hardware claims
+ Full-stack scope from hardware through RTOS, Linux, and security architecture covers more than firmware coding alone
+ Small team size means direct senior engineering involvement on every engagement
- Founded in 2022 with 2 to 10 employees, giving it one of the shortest track records and smallest teams on this list
- Capacity for large or multiple concurrent programs is limited by team size
- No published pricing or minimum engagement figure
Ripcord Designs
+ Founder background as an Engineering Director at a named prior employer (Broadcast Sports) gives its origin story specificity
+ Explicitly frames its role as providing an independent perspective on architecture and technical risk
+ 10 years of operating history spanning MedTech, IVD, robotics, and consumer electronics sectors
+ Compliance support work is bundled alongside design consulting, useful for regulated-product hiring needs
- Team size is not published, making bench-depth verification for a larger program harder without a direct conversation
- Some founding-date and headcount details are thin in public sources and would benefit from direct confirmation
- No published pricing or minimum engagement figure

Who should choose ARCH-Embedded?

A typical fit: hiring engineers with direct positioning-technology experience for a location-aware device.

Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology, Industrial IoT.

Who should choose Ripcord Designs?

A typical fit: hiring senior technical judgment directly, without management layers, for a MedTech or IVD device.

Founded by a former Engineering Director who moved from managing engineering to doing it directly, spanning MedTech, IVD, and industrial products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in MedTech, IVD & lab devices, Robotics & industrial, Consumer electronics.

Decision matrix: ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Both offer fixed-price models
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: ARCH-Embedded (Not published) vs Ripcord Designs (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Ripcord Designs
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs

Use case ARCH-Embedded fit Ripcord Designs fit Winner
Hiring engineers with direct positioning-technology experience for a location-aware device Strong Strong Both equally
Nordic Semiconductor-based connected product architecture and firmware development Strong Limited ARCH-Embedded
Hiring senior technical judgment directly, without management layers, for a MedTech or IVD device Strong Strong Both equally
Compliance-aware design consulting for a robotics or industrial product Limited Strong Ripcord Designs
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs

Ripcord Designs (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. Founded by a former Engineering Director who moved from managing engineering to doing it directly, spanning MedTech, IVD, and industrial products.

ARCH-Embedded (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need nordic Semiconductor-based connected product architecture and firmware development. If your situation matches that, ARCH-Embedded is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

ARCH-Embedded vs Ripcord Designs FAQ

Is ARCH-Embedded better than Ripcord Designs?

Ripcord Designs (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ARCH-Embedded's strongest advantage: team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background. Ripcord Designs's strongest advantage: founder background as an Engineering Director at a named prior employer (Broadcast Sports) gives its origin story specificity.

How do ARCH-Embedded and Ripcord Designs differ in pricing?

ARCH-Embedded uses project-based embedded consultancy engagements pricing. Ripcord Designs uses project-based electronics and firmware consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: ARCH-Embedded or Ripcord Designs?

ARCH-Embedded is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between ARCH-Embedded and Ripcord Designs?

ARCH-Embedded's primary differentiator is: team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background. Ripcord Designs's primary differentiator is: founded by a former Engineering Director who moved from managing engineering to doing it directly, spanning MedTech, IVD, and industrial products. They also differ in team size (2–10 vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Micro-mobility, Positioning and location technology vs MedTech, IVD & lab devices).

Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.