RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
RMB Consulting (4.3/5) edges ahead of EmLogic AS (3.8/5) overall. RMB Consulting is the better choice for teams wanting to work directly with one named, 30-year-tenured firmware engineer. EmLogic AS is the stronger option for teams wanting Zephyr RTOS specialists led by repeat embedded-company founders. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | RMB Consulting | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1995 | 2021 |
| HQ | Frederick, MD, USA (also Tampa, FL) | Norway |
| Team size | 1–10 | Not published |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 30-plus years of hands-on embedded engineering experience concentrated in a single named principal with a public technical record | Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS |
| Pricing model | Project-based and hourly consulting engagements | Project-based embedded design engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Bare-Metal Firmware | Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C |
| Industries served | Industrial, Consumer electronics, Medical devices | Industrial, IoT hardware |
RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS: overview
RMB Consulting
RMB Consulting has operated in embedded systems design and consulting since 1995, run by founder and chief engineer Nigel Jones, who brings more than 30 years of professional embedded systems engineering experience and a long-running record of public technical writing on firmware design. For a client hiring a small team, working directly with a single named, 30-year-tenured engineer, rather than being assigned whichever staff member is available, is close to the smallest and most direct version of an engineering-hire relationship this list offers.
EmLogic AS
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. For a hiring buyer, that founder background matters: this is a team led by people who've already built and run comparable firms before, not first-time founders learning the business alongside the client. The firm's stated depth in Zephyr RTOS is a specific, current specialty in the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as a de facto standard.
Services and capabilities: RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS
| Capability | RMB Consulting | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Hardware co-design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety | ✗ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS
| Framework / platform | RMB Consulting | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| LVGL | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS
| Criterion | RMB Consulting | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based consulting, Hourly consulting | Project-based embedded design |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS
| Dimension | RMB Consulting | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial, Consumer electronics, Medical devices | Industrial, IoT hardware |
| Best use cases | Hiring a single, deeply experienced engineer for a bare-metal firmware project, Second-opinion technical review from someone with a long public track record | Hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders, Migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr |
| Typical project type | Project-based consulting | Project-based embedded design |
RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS: pros and cons
| RMB Consulting | |
|---|---|
| + | 30 years of professional embedded engineering experience concentrated in one named, publicly verifiable principal |
| + | A substantial public technical writing record lets a hiring buyer evaluate expertise before ever making contact |
| + | 30 years of operating history under the same founder gives continuity most larger firms can't offer |
| + | Team size of 1 to 10 means zero layers between the client and the engineer doing the work |
| - | A team of 1 to 10 people severely limits capacity for a large or multi-workstream engagement |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| - | Availability may be constrained given the founder-led, low-headcount structure |
| EmLogic AS | |
|---|---|
| + | All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship |
| + | Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system much of the industry now treats as a de facto standard |
| + | FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects needing custom logic as well as MCU code |
| + | Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving access to a broader company-building network |
| - | Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any team on this list |
| - | Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose RMB Consulting?
A typical fit: hiring a single, deeply experienced engineer for a bare-metal firmware project.
30-plus years of hands-on embedded engineering experience concentrated in a single named principal with a public technical record. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, Consumer electronics, Medical devices.
Who should choose EmLogic AS?
A typical fit: hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders.
Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware.
Decision matrix: RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: RMB Consulting (Not published) vs EmLogic AS (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | RMB Consulting |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | RMB Consulting |
Use case fit: RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS
| Use case | RMB Consulting fit | EmLogic AS fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiring a single, deeply experienced engineer for a bare-metal firmware project | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Second-opinion technical review from someone with a long public track record | Strong | Limited | RMB Consulting |
| Hiring a Zephyr RTOS specialist team led by experienced repeat founders | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Limited | Strong | EmLogic AS |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS
RMB Consulting (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. 30-plus years of hands-on embedded engineering experience concentrated in a single named principal with a public technical record.
EmLogic AS (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need migrating existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr. If your situation matches that, EmLogic AS is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
RMB Consulting vs EmLogic AS FAQ
Is RMB Consulting better than EmLogic AS?
RMB Consulting (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. RMB Consulting's strongest advantage: 30 years of professional embedded engineering experience concentrated in one named, publicly verifiable principal. EmLogic AS's strongest advantage: all four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship.
How do RMB Consulting and EmLogic AS differ in pricing?
RMB Consulting uses project-based and hourly consulting engagements pricing. EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: RMB Consulting or EmLogic AS?
RMB Consulting is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between RMB Consulting and EmLogic AS?
RMB Consulting's primary differentiator is: 30-plus years of hands-on embedded engineering experience concentrated in a single named principal with a public technical record. EmLogic AS's primary differentiator is: founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. They also differ in team size (1–10 vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial, Consumer electronics vs Industrial, IoT hardware).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.